You all rememeber that time when the ATF thought they could just determine that a trigger, standing alone, constituted a machine gun? Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, goes back to the case of NAGR v. Garland, a challenge to ATF’s rule on these triggers, but now the DOJ is fighting back with new ammunition. You see, it appears that there is some sloppy language in the Cargill opinion that DOJ has now attached itself to in furtherance of their argument that these trigger do, in fact, constitute unlawful machine guns. Does this ATF rule suddently have more life thanks to Cargill? Learn more today and arm yourself with education today.
Read Memorandum Here. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca5.216543/gov.uscourts.ca5.216543.91.0_1.pdf
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Have a Video Idea? https://forms.gle/GNCyRw1HRqvAmwik6
JOIN THE WGL NEWSLETTER:
Subscribe to our Newsletter to stay up to date on all issues that affect your rights by going to https://www.washingtongunlaw.com/newsletter
Contact Washington Gun Law
If you have any questions about this topic, or anything else related to what’s left of our Second Amendment Rights, remember you can always contact us at:
www.washingtongunlaw.com or call us directly at 425-765-0487.
Stay safe.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Applicable Statutes:
Other Resources:
Subscribe to our Newsletter to stay up to date on all issues that affect your rights by going to https://www.washingtongunlaw.com/newsletter
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to use on Rumble. https://rumble.com/c/WashingtonGunLaw
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw
Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw
Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington