So does Justice Sotomayor’s concession that semi automatic rifles are commonly available and therefore in common use? Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, dives into the one sentence that has the Youtubiverse all spun up from the minority opinion in the matter of Cargill v. Garland. This now sucessful challenge to ATF’s bump stock ban is a mere 19 pages long, but the dissenting opinion is 18 pages in length. But of all those 18 pages, it is one sentence from the Justice that has many wondering if she has now conceded that assault weapon bans, are in fact, unconstitutional? Perhaps we need to first undertand the historical background to the common use test so that you can decide how critical this admission truly is. Arm yourself with education today.
United States v. Miller. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/174/
District of Columbia v. Heller. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/
Caetano v. Massachusetts. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/577/14-10078/case.pdf
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Have a Video Idea? https://forms.gle/GNCyRw1HRqvAmwik6
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Contact Washington Gun Law
If you have any questions about this topic, or anything else related to what’s left of our Second Amendment Rights, remember you can always contact us at:
www.washingtongunlaw.com or call us directly at 425-765-0487.
Stay safe.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Rumble. https://rumble.com/c/WashingtonGunLaw
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw
Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw
Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington