We told you so. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the matter of Cooper v. Attorney General of the United States, a challenge to 18 USC Sec. 922(g)(3) which is the prohibition of congtrolled subtances users from possessing firearms. This challenge, which literally mirrors the challenge in US v. Daniels has a new twist to it, and that is the holdings in United States v. Rahimi. When the opinion was first published, and we know that we were in the minority, but we said there was way, way too much problematic langauge in that opinion that could be shoved down our throats for years to come. Well, today is a fine example of that. So learn more today and arm yourself with education.
Read the Memorandum here. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca11.80714/gov.uscourts.ca11.80714.63.0.pdf
________________________________________________________________________
Have a Video Idea? Help WGL Out. https://forms.gle/GNCyRw1HRqvAmwik6
_____________________________________________________________________
Contact Washington Gun Law
If you have any questions about this topic, or anything else related to what’s left of our Second Amendment Rights, remember you can always contact us at:
www.washingtongunlaw.com or call us directly at 425-765-0487.
Stay safe.
_____________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Rumble. https://rumble.com/c/WashingtonGunLaw
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw
Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw
Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington